Friday, April 4, 2008

Samsung, the pride of Korea



I read an article which told me that Samsung marked the 70th anniversary of its founding on March 22. It was very interesting because I didn’t know that Samsung had a long history like that.

Samsung is one of the most successful corporations in Korea. Needless to say about its influence on Korean economy, it actually marked its sales to 152 trillion won in 2006, 14.2 trillion won in net profit, and 64 trillion won in export. But then, now what? So far, Samsung seems to be the most successful company in Korea. However, there are some critical threats that can damage Samsung’s strength seriously.

Samsung is now facing a huge legal problem. The lawyer who worked for Samsung came out of the company, and he revealed some serious illegal actions that Samsung did in the past. Even though no one thinks that Samsung will collapse because of this matter, Samsung is having a hard time. In addition, the global market seems to be not so easy to Samsung. Although Samsung did make a great job in the past, there is no certain prediction that Samsung will go on its business successfully in the future. In short, Samsung is now facing some threats that can seriously damage its business career, which means Samsung is in need for solutions.

There are two kinds of solutions that can be done to help Samsung come out of this situation. First, the government and social organizations should give Samsung some kind of a favor. Even though Samsung made some illegal mistakes, why don’t we give it a break? Korea is now the 12th rich nation in the world, and everyone agrees that Korea is going its way to become an advanced country. However, without Samsung still competing in the global market, Korea will not be strong enough to keep on developing. It is certain that Samsung got lessons from this matter, so why don’t we just give it a favor?

Second, Samsung itself should keep go on developing its strength. Great deeds in the past and possessing lots of money in current situation, doesn’t mean that it will be the same in the future. Samsung should make some dramatic movement to fulfill the challenge that it’s facing. They should invest more money on R&D, and they should pick great young people to lead its future. Not only excellent in academic skills, but also fulfilling the need of honesty in the environment. In short, they should pick HGU students.


Reference : http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSOD&mid=sec&sid1=108&oid=014&aid=0001955903


20700273 Entry 4

Woori Bank to Cut Money Transfer Fees


          Having money transfered in Korea always has been a pain of the neck since the transaction fees were too high compared to any other countries. Unless you are covered with some sort of special promotion or on a contract, some customers have to pay the fees even the transation was happened within their bank.

          From this Friday, Woori Bank announced that it would decrease its transation fees at its offline outlets nationwide to help people who are using the service instead of online banking which the fee is much cheaper.

          According to the article, Woori Bank will "...lower charges on remittance of less than 100,000 won ($103) for Woori customers to other banks to 1,000 won ($1.3) from 3,000 won. " (BusinessWeek). Also, the commision on transactions of 100,000 won to 1 million won will be lowered to 2,000 won from 3,000 won. The fees for the intra transfers will be also cut down to 500 won and 1,000 won depending on whether the amount is less or more than 1 million won.

          In an effort to decrease the transaction fees, the government also played an important role to pressure the major banks to cut down its fees. The Fair Trade Commission charged 9.59 billion won in fines last month on eight mojor banks in Korea for fixing foreign currency commission fees. Some pundits are worrying that if the government gets into the action directly, it might promote those major banks to work together and protest against the goverment's action; however, since so many citizens or their service users are finding that the fees are too high in Korea, the article states that other banks are more likely to follow Woori Bank's steps.

          I think it's about time for banks in Korea to lower their service charges. When I had accounts with Bank of America or HSBC Direct, they didn't charge that much for the services, and often they even eliminated the fees if I was using their ATM machines. Therefore, I strongly agree with their efforts to meet customer's demand and needs.


Reference;
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2008/04/123_21942.html

20601008 - 4th Entry

LG Telecom Launches Open Internet for Mobiles



LG Telecom mad a new challenge to local mobile internet environment by launching an open, full-browsing internet service at a low price. They Launched the Oz service on Thursday, with an attractive fixed-rate plan that allows unlimited data download for 6000 won per month (It is $6 per month). The CEO of LG telecom, Jung ll- Jae said that before Oz, phone users had to visit firms’ portal sites to gain access to the mobile Internet and they had to pay for information which was free for PCs. Now they will develop an open Internet world for mobile phones where everyone can enjoy the Internet. Mobile Internet services in Korea are provided in a closed portal from each telecom companies. Mostly, they are slow, hard to customize. Also, users, internet companies and foreign phone makers were frustrated by this too. Portals are notorious for charging users for services and data subscription fees were much higher than broadband Internet fees for PCs. The CEO had decided that it is time to open up the mobile Internet environment for users to freely go to the websites just like using PCs. LG telecom first introduced two premium handsets from LG Electronics and Japan’s Casio for the launch of the Oz service. However, the CEO’s mind is to sell more than ten models in 2008. Just the reminder, the overall users for each top three Telecom firms in South Korea is 22.4 million for SK Telecom, 13.9 million for KTF and 7.9 million for LG telecom. SK Telecom and KTF have been investing to establish the third-generation (3G) platform(WCDMA), which allows face to face video call services. LG telecom has gone a separate way and improved its existing 2G network with much less investment. They focused on implementing the full screen PC internet interface onto the small phone screen.

http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2008/04/123_21896.html

20620042 entry #4

Google's green light: turbulent ad war



I read a article that Google's aquisition is approved. Recently, the Microsoft, dominant software company, tried to take over Yahoo. And Google, dominant serching company, now try to take over DoubleClick. In the searching service industry, the advertising power is very important. And it decides the market share of the company. Google occupied almost 70 percent of the search market. And the second is Yahoo.

The EU approved Google's extension. Even before that time, EU thoroughly regulated monopoly. But now Google has the rights to occupy the Europe market. On the other hand, Microsoft didn't get approval to merge Yahoo. Microsoft is already a huge and monopolic company in software market. If Microsoft occupy the searching and displaying market, Microsoft can become a supernational company. In America, the antitrust law is very powerful. Then, why the government don't regulate Google? It's because the government admited somewhat monopoly. But they regulate the conglomerate monopoly.

What are advantages of that companies by taking over other internet companies? The article says it's because the share of ad banners. You see everyday ad banners everywhere. And you might think 'Why companies try these things? I think it's wastes of money.' . But actually the influences of that ads are very effective. And that's the reason companies try to influence their share in the ads market like banners. Google's aquisition will bring many powerful influences in search market.

I think the monopoly is the common flow of the world. But excessive monopolies must be regulated by governments or nonprofit organizations. If we could't defend this flows, and someday the basis of capitalism will crumble


20700067 entry 4

reference: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2008/tc20080311_855889.htm?chan=innovation_branding_top+stories